|
|
REDWOOD
NEEDLES
Presented by the Sierra Club Redwood Chapter
Newsletter,
The REDWOOD NEEDLES
Return to Article
Menu
Watershed Protection Alliance Founded To Deal With
Hillside Vineyards
By Shepherd Bliss, Sonoma Group Agriculture-Wetlands
Chair
A coalition of community and environmental groups began
meeting regularly last October to consider erosion control
and related issues caused by the expanding number of
hillside vineyards and to carefully craft an appropriate
response. The new Sonoma County Watershed Protection
Alliance (WPA) has evolved from those meetings. Initiated by
the Sierra Club's Sonoma Group, under the leadership of
David Bannister, and the Sonoma County Conservation Action
(SCCA), led by Mark Green. The meetings have included
members of more than a dozen Sonoma County environ-mental,
community, and agricultural groups, listed at the end of
this article.
"Oak trees and wildlife habitat are being ripped out to
make way for grapes on slopes that are frequently too steep,
causing erosion, loss of essential habitat for wildlife, and
loss of our beautiful hills," according to a recent issue of
SCCA News. "Other than requiring a grading permit, the
county has no regulations to manage these practices and
protect our resources!" A woman attending a WPA meeting who
lives in the Dry Creek grape region outside Healdsburg
commented, "I feel as if we are living in a logging camp
with all the big Gallo Winery trucks taking out the clear
cut timber."
WPA meetings at the Environ-mental Center in Santa Rosa
have included guest speakers from Napa Conty reporting on
the successes and failures of their hillside ordinance and
Sonoma County Supervisor Mike Reilly providing a map of the
political terrain. The group has discussed the wine
industry's preference for voluntary guidelines and peer
review; the new Fish Friendly Farming Project, funded
partially by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); and
how the listing of coho salmon and steelheads as threatened
under the Endangered Species Act might influence this
effort.
Grapegrower and winemaker, Marty Griffin, circulated
photographs documenting the problems being created by
hillside vineyards. Two other grapegrowers, Terry Harrison
of Community Alliance with Family Farmers and George Davis
of Friends of the Twin Valley, have been active with WPA.
They have educated WPA members about the wine industry.
Davis, for example, has pointed out that "the best grapes
are grown on hillsides."
Part of the group's focus has been to get a hillisde
ordinance, though others have been concerned with the
long-term issues of educating the public on the wine
industry. WPA has explored placing an ordinance on the
November, l998 ballot. Recognizing the mounting public
concern with the vineyards and the growing coalition to
challenge them, the Sonoma County Grape Growers Association
and United Winegrowers for Sonoma County invited ten members
of the fledgling WPA on a November 8 tour of one of Gallo's
vineyards and a stream resotration project. Also attending
were Farm Bureau members, Sonoma County Supervisor Paul
Kelly, who appears to oppose a hillside vineyard ordinance
like Napa County has, and Mike Reilly, who favors an
ordinance similar to Napa County's.
Rick Theis, Executive Director of the Grape Growers
Association, reported in the Farm Bureau News, "While
nothing was resolved, everyone attending the field trip
seemed pleased that a dialogue had begun among farmers and
environ-mentalists on this issue."
Twelve representatives of the wine industry, twelve WPA
members, and a hired facilitator met on December 12. At that
meeting a wine industry representative admited the
"inevitability of a hillside vineyard ordinance." So, in
mid-January a smaller team from both sides sat down to begin
writing such an ordinance.
WPA's two primary issues in the ordinance are l) loss of
biotic resources/ wildlands/ habitat for native plants and
animals and biodiversity, and 2) erosion and impacts on
water quality and soil conservation resulting from
development for agricultural uses, roads, homes, and timber
harvest plans. These concerns include issues such as
riparian zone protection, recontouring slopes, and
viewsheds/aesthetics. Other issues are pesticide use and the
development of a winegrape monoculture.
At the December meeting the wine industry expressed
concern with the right to farm, private property, government
regulations and the economic impact on landowners. They also
spoke of what one winemaker described as "the problem
person, the cowboy" who plants a vineyard poorly, creating
erosion and other problems. For example, Kenneth Wilson is
currently facing fines into the millions of dollars from the
North Coast Regional Water Quality Board for tons of
sediment state regulators say washed from his vineyard into
the Gualala River. Water run-off down a hillside on his
property left ditches six feet deep and eight feet wide.
Joan Vilms of Friends of the Russian River articulated a
need for "a land ethic with peer pressure and the use of
shame at doing damage." (The WPA is currently raising money
to hire Vilms to help write the ordinance.) The wine
industry advocated an ombudsman, monitor or mentor from each
watershed to watch over vineyard developments. A grapegrower
admited, "We do need environmental education within the
agricultural community." Environmentalists present agreed
that we need education about agriculture.
The WPA includes members from the following major
environmental groups: Audubon Society, California Native
Plant Society, Friends of the Russian River, Russian River
Watershed Protection Council, Earth First! and Community
Alliance with Family Farmers. Also included are individuals
from groups with a singular focus, such as Friends of Twin
Valley which is challenging Gallo, and Graton Alliance to
Stop Pollution (GASP) which is struggling with Associated
Vintage Group's massive expansion. Members of other groups
attending WPA meetings include Blucher Creek Watershed
Council, Californians for Alternatives to Toxics, and
Cunningham Marsh Preservation Committee.
For further information contact:
Shepherd Bliss, (707) 829-8185,
P.O. Box l040, Sebastopol, CA. 95473.
Return to Article
Menu
Last updated on 2/21/98
Comments or suggestions? Drop us a line at heyneedles@aol.com
|